Sunday, March 22, 2009

the jazz audience

I go out to clubs to hear jazz --   our local artists, headliners from NYC, European jazz groups on tour.  I'm often at the Jazz Bakery, since I live a few blocks away, and I've recently been at Spazio's, Cafe 322, Steamers, the Crowne Plaza, in a word, the usual suspects.  Here's something I notice - a good part of the jazz audience consists of jazz musicians.  I usually run into players I know when I'm at concerts or clubs.  I also see musicians from other disciplines - classical players, film composers, what have you.  

As is often noted, the clubs are under-attended and it's difficult for jazz or any musical acts to fill a house.  

I hear sometimes hear musicians talk about audiences with an "us- and-them" mentality.   I'm going to float an idea here -- We're a big part of the audience -- "them" is largely ourselves.  if we musicians attend more clubs and concerts, we'll be supporting the venues, helping our colleagues get repeat bookings, and  even diagonally supporting our own musical endeavors by keeping the places open.  The clubs are often small to begin with and a few tables would make the difference between profit and loss for the night.

On an off-night, it's nice to stay home, get to bed early, rest the ears.  Go home and make pasta, see what's come in from Netflicks, rule despotically over our minions, that sort of thing.

YES, AND -- If we musician types extend ourselves a bit - push away from the table after the strudel, oof... and go see people's sets, look what awaits us:

We'll be able to dig a little jazz ourselves, crack wise with the band on their break, pester the club-owner with our CDs, have a drink, keep the club in business, have the gratitude of our colleagues whom we've come to see, guilt them into coming to hear us play...  Wotta great setup, itza perfect evening.  Really all that's required is finding the shoes, putting them on again, that's it... getting in the car and driving to a club.  Happy music-iarse, Louis

Monday, December 22, 2008

New (ish) ways to practice


At Jerry Kalaf's Christmas Party this year, bassist Larry Steen and pianist Rich Ruttenberg got into a discussion about how they practice and stay inspired as soloists.  Here are a couple of methods I've gotten mileage out of lately:

It's possible to practice silently -- doing everything you would do with your hands but not pressing down on the piano keys, plucking strings, etc.   It's a way to stay warm between pieces of music and prepare for piece you're about to play.  A few years ago I started doing this and started seeing some unexpected benefits -- Hey, it also means that when someone is making a windy speech you can be soloing on "Moment's Notice"...


Playing soundlessly (on piano) means much smaller motions than usual.  I had always wasted energy before -- lifting higher than necessary off the keys.  As I got into this kind of practicing -- there was a steady gig I was doing with classical accompanying, and lengthy pauses between the pieces-- my hand and finger motion became much more efficient.  

I took it further and got into playing so that my fingers would seldom lose contact with the tops of the keys -- the vertical motion became really minimal.   As I was doing this I was also practicing leaping accurately up and down the keyboard without looking at the keys.  Looking down at the keys interferes with sight-reading, watching a conductor or soloist, etc.  So I got more control of my vertical and horizontal hand motion through this kind of practicing.

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

I got one of the 80-gig ipods a couple of years ago.  I started doing what everyone does -- uploading CDs I owned or borrowed and buying music on itunes.   It really improved the quality of my listening -- I had access to a lot of great music at any time.

OK, I have insomnia.  At some point watching TV or reading at night evolved into searching for jazz or ethnic music on the internet with youtube, pandora, and allmusic.com.  I started listening more intently -- not using the music as background, but listening pretty intently, often playing tunes several times, focusing on one instrument at a time.  I would sometimes finger a small keyboard with the sound turned off while listening.  I got more into music (and less into NPR) when driving.

Through "active" listening, one "gets better" at musical concentration...   I got into a whole phase of listening to great drumset players, checking out the vocabulary and the endless possibilities...  Lately listening has become a big part of the evolution of my soloing.  I'm getting interested in, or evolving in areas I hadn't considered before... (Yeah, OK, like counting to 8...)

It also seems that there is something to be said for listening or working on music before being "fully awake".  It seems as though the whole "what-the-notes-are-for-and where-they're-going" thing can burn in deeper before starting the "words-sentences-and-decisions" part of the day...  It's also nice to spend time with just-plain-excellent, "Swiss-pharmaceutical-laboratory" music -- I mean, if you're going to make yourself deaf, it might as well be with late Coltrane, Fauré's song-cycles,Teddy Wilson, Kenny Barron, Bulgarian folk, Palestrina, John Abercrombie, Joao Gilberto, Bartok's quartets, kna'meann?

I'd like to hear how other players practice, especially for memorizing tunes, which can be hard for me.  Comment-ses, anyone?

Sunday, August 10, 2008

Web publicity for your music


I met publicist Lexi Kavanaugh when I was playing in Chicago last November.  Lexi has given me some great suggestions for promoting my music on the web.  I wanted to share her advice with the Jazz community...


 • Google yourself every few months and see what's coming up.  This is a big part of the face you present to the world, not just your webpage.  Before I started following Lexi's advice I was seeing about 6 pages on my name and some of them were ancient.  There were a lot of gigs I'd played that weren't coming up.  Also, videos of my trio  put on Youtube were not showing up.  Two months after I got started on her suggestions my Google listings had jumped to 12 pages and there were many more gigs, films, albums included.  So, here are what some of her suggestions were...

• If website designer fees are an obstacle, there are companies like godaddy and dynamod that offer template-based website design -- you pick a template, enter text, upload images, -- set up and revise your website yourself with no designer's fees.  

• Whatever web presence you have, make sure the sites all have links to each other!  This makes it easier for search engines to find them.

• If you don't have reviews of your music yet, get blurbs (short statements) from fans, musicians you play with, employers.  Use them on your website, when you send around your CDs to get reviewed, etc.

• Make your website in HTML rather than Flash because the text in flash is not readable by search engines.  If you have a flash site up, put in as many relevant meta-tags (the section of text that the web-crawlers see), and see if it can be duplicated in an HTML site.
.
• Write a Wikipedia article on yourself, very easy to do.

• Sell your music on CD Baby.  From there it will be picked up by itunes, napster and other music sites.  Also, their articles on marketing are really helpful.

• List your gigs in lajazz.com and other relevant sites.

Remember that music fans are really curious about their favorite performers.  Remember reading a Downbeat interview with one of your heroes over and over? So - 

• Start a blog, let your listeners get to know you through writing.

• Write thank-you notes to the people who come to your gigs or buy your albums.

•  Make a lens on Squidoo about your music, create Myspace and Facebook pages.

• Enlist the help of your audiences to get the word out about your music -- ask people at your gigs to blog about your group.  When you get email addresses, get zipcodes also, so when you book tours you know who to email.

• Pianist Tamir Hendelman suggests Marty Khan's book on the business side of jazz called Straight Ahead

12) Create T-shirts and other merchandise your fans can order with cafepress.com.

---Obviously, none of these are direct ways to book for your group.  They are all ways to expand your web presence.  When a booker, a leader, or someone deciding which club to go to this Friday googles you, there will be more there for him or her to see.

Saturday, July 26, 2008

Four recording sessions


I played four sessions over a few days time.  At each session, the demands were a little different.  Here's what happened...

The first two were sessions for film composer Miriam Cutler.  She had scored a documentary about journalist Helen Thomas.  She had done a MIDI mockup of the score and was replacing the parts with acoustic instruments.  For the first session I brought a Roland VK-8 over to her house, an organ with drawbars that imitates a Hammond B3 well. 

We started by listening to some of the soundtrack of “Get Shorty”.  Green Onions was in the soundtrack and there were good greasy organ parts on other cues.  We used what we heard as a starting point for sounds. I decided to get sounds entirely by shifting drawbars, not using presets and a volume pedal because that way I could make the sound evolve during long notes or over the length of the cue.  I memorized a drawbar starting point for each cue so I could get back when I needed to.  It made the parts more expressive.

She had already recorded accordion, terrific playing by Nick Ariondo. My parts doubled his sometimes.  Everything else in the monitors were parts from her MIDI mockup.  The accordion spoke kind of slowly, the organ speaks quickly, so I was listening to the click and to his parts and estimating when to play.  When overdubbing I listen and try to remember the timing of as many of the attacks and releases as I can.  It’s like counting cards --  “these are right on the click; these hits are late; these two parts are flamming...

We had a good time doing it.  We started listening to dialogue as we recorded.  Miriam is a "sperienced" film composer, sensitive to dialogue and editing.  She's also a nice, bright, cultured type so it's always nice working with her.  Sometimes I was playing her written parts, sometimes she was having me get away from the score and it was a nice challenge to improvise parts yet stay suitable to dialogue.  As we listened, she had the accordion down and the organ up…I said, “why don’t you put it a little the opposite, have the accordion up and the organ behind?".  That ended up being a nice thing;  it made the music sound more human and greasy.  

•••••••

     The next morning, we met at Carl Sealove’s to record piano for the same documentary.  Carl has a Mason Hamlin – it’s a terrific instrument.  I struggle with the headphone mix there sometimes since they usually listen to the same monitor mix that I do.  At sessions, I hear a lot of piano acoustically since I'm sitting at it -- I usually want much less piano in the cans than anyone else does.

  There were a few kinds of cues, she was conservative with her themes.  There were triadic even parts - really simple and effective.  You really felt tension and release.  There was swinging, bluesy piano parts that went with the organ.  She used the same ideas in different cues but with different tempos, keys and scoring so it was a nice varied score.  I liked what was going down.  Again, I was playing with the accordion and sometimes with the organ that I played the night before, and since the accordion spoke a little slowly I would find myself playing later…playing behind the click to match the accordion.  When I finished, Carl was going to play bass on the cues, I hope it wasn't too hard to follow!


  Carl recorded in Digital Performer (which is what Miriam uses).  We went from cue to cue very quickly and Miriam would have me do several passes.  One where I would play the written part, then other passes where she would make requests like, “play something high and loopy”, “play something that fills up the middle”,  “just go nuts on this one in a Kurt Weill kind of way” -- it’s a nice way to work.  It must mean a lot of extra listening and editing for her when she’s done --  but we’ve done several scores like this and she seems like she enjoys every part of the process.  Again, these are smart, witty people.  It’s really a pleasure to be around them and work with them.  

••••••••

     That was Thursday night and Friday night…the following Monday night Matt Aschkynazo and I went to Stagg Street Studio in Van Nuys.  Gary Denton, the studio owner, engineered…  We had done some quartet recording before with Larry Steen playing acoustic bass and Chris Wabich playing drums.  We were coming back to replace a couple of guitar solos. Matt wanted me along to listen and to record a couple of duo tunes.  Stagg Street has a Yamaha C7, they’ve changed out the action and revoiced it.  It was sounding good.  

We got started around 9pm.  There had been a little leakage at the original session and it became clear that wherever he wanted to replace guitar, I’d have to replace piano.  We started with the duo tunes, I’m really curious to hear what went down on one of them.  It was a bluesy tune, a Scofield tune, "Heaven Hill".  We tried a “drunk and stoned” way of playing on one of the takes and made the time wobble all through the take.  We were both having fun.  I don’t know if it was a keeper but it was great fun playing that way...   We worked our way down our "list.  We got plenty done but I felt myself getting tired and snippy.  We'd only worked 3 hours but it was close to midnight and I was fading.  Recording when you're not alert or feeling well can be a real test.  Once I played a session after scratching my cornea.  The playing went well but I was in this weird kind of pain!   Matt suggested we come back another night and I was releaved. 

•••••••

Wednesday morning I had a session to record a piece with a vocalist called, “O Sleep, Why Dost Thou Leave Me?” -- an art song by Handel.   The session was with a tenor who was using it as part of an audition reel.   Karen Swerdlow sent the project my way and she has a Kawai tall upright at her studio -- not the first choice for a classical music session but workable.    The vocalist had a sweet lyric tenor sound and sangthe song very well.


The morning of the session I spent an hour trying different ornamentation – trills and mordents and working out fingerings until I ended up with something that sounded good to me - and a little intricate.  When I got to the studio, I went straight to the piano and tried phrases, getting the right touch to evoke a clavichord... The tenor asked me if I would try a keyboard with a harpsichord sound for this? We tried  a Korg Triton…it sounded wa-a-y too cheesy.  I can’t remember ever hearing a keyboard harpsichord spatch sound good.  So we used the piano and it worked it out well.   

The vocalist was happy with the second take so we called it.  One of those questions we all wrestle with:  I felt like I had a better take in me, but the client said we were done.  I often wonder whether to say something or not.  (I did a session with Guitarist Jeff Golub once and he was not shy about asking for additional takes until he was happy, maybe I should be more assertive like that).   The vocalist sounded very good; I've lost his card or I'd mention him here.

Saturday, May 3, 2008

auditioning for musical theater, part 1


How can vocalists be well-prepared for musical theater auditions?  I’ve been at auditions as a music director, as a rehearsal pianist, or as both.  I have enough interaction with the actors when talking over or playing their selections that I feel like I’m on both sides of the table most of the time.  The actors often have a very different impression of what's happened at their auditions than those they've auditioned for; I'm writing this in the hope that it may help to close that gap a bit...  I’ll pass on the collective experience and  thinking of some of my colleagues and myself.  Since acting, singing, dependability and work ethic are all considered together at auditions, I’m going to write this in two parts; this first one being about considerations beside the musical ones...

Getting to know “Them” 

Who is your likely audience at auditions?  Surprisingly, it’s everyone you see once you walk in the door or even talk on the phone with before and after the audition.  Think about it: the production staff work together, often for several days with the callbacks.  They’ll be busy when auditioners are showing up promptly, and have down time when there are stragglers or cancellations.  The staff are sitting in a rehearsal hall for long hours, so they often chat during down time about who they’ve seen, and who else they know who might be good for a role.  A receptionist is likely to be part of the theater company and will hear your singing through the door.  The other actors in the waiting room?  Some may be cast right off while others are called back, and as pre-production or rehearsals start, those early casts might also be asked about the people they know or have heard.  The pianist?  As a rehearsal pianist, I’ve never played auditions where I wasn’t asked my opinions about the voices I heard.  I’m not saying you should worry about who you interact with, but that everyone could be someone who matters. 

Often actors seem obsessed with their own performance and skills before, during and after an audition.  You should be concerned with these things, yet you should also be well-rested and calm enough to observe and reflect in the moment.  Part of that is knowing your material well enough that you could be flexible with it and somewhat relaxed while performing.

What “they” are looking for generally  

There are aspects of hiring for theater specific to music and acting – and other aspects that aren’t so different from hiring a receptionist, a waiter, a dance teacher, a babysitter…  

Employers in just about every potential job look for the feeling that they can count on the person they’re hiring, that they will do the job well, that they will be able to understand one another, that they will be able to work together easily, and possibly have some fun in doing so.  Again, if this seems off-topic, it's all aimed toward helping you empathize with the people you’re auditioning for. 

Someone who solves problems or makes them go away is always appreciated as an employee.  If an actor says, “I don’t drive”, that’s a potential problem -- that they may pass on to the production.  If they come in saying “I don’t drive, but I have a driver and I’ll be early to everything”, then that means they have a problem they are solving themselves -- and won't be passing on…  

Someone who takes the time to learn a song from the show before auditioning is showing good initiative and work ethic.  However, singing something really well usually trumps a lesser attempt to demonstrate willingness to work.

In the auditioning room you are likely to find any of these: the director, the musical director, producer, choreographer, writer, rehearsal pianist, interns or other staff, other cast members, a video camera.  Typically, the director will be sympathetic to the nerves of the auditioners and keep attendance down and distractions to a minimum.  If this is not the case, it may indicate a director or producer either inexperienced or insensitive – careful!  

Musical directors are typically looking for: (not in any order of preference) good musicianship (ability to learn music quickly and well, ability to sing harmony, etc.), good pitch, good range, a good sound for solo or ensemble, good rhythmic feel, sufficient volume,  suitability for the musical style of the role or show (Part 2 of this article will be specific about music).

Music directors are often calculating as they hear auditions, like: “after I cover the two leads, If I can get one real first soprano and one real tenor somewhere in the cast, I can move parts around and make everything else work with mid-range voices.” 

Directors have to consider casting issues – whether two people would be believable on stage as a couple, does someone seem easy to work with, etc.  Often the others involved in musical auditions -- directors, producers, other people involved – are not able to hear music differences as acutely as “the music people”.  So they may naturally think more about other issues they know better than singing – whether an actor has an aptitude for comedy, moves well, etc.  They also have casting issues to consider that could be about anything under the sun – eg. the height of the actors…

In our age of film and television, casting can be more important to the success of a production than anyone would ever wish.  Actors are expected to have good voices and ranges, make difficult songs seem easy, AND act, AND dance, AND look the part, AND have a track record, AND have some box office draw – well, that’s a lot of demands on the cast!  I’ve seen people chosen or passed over based on issues that had very little to do with how they sang or their acting.  It’s good to remember that after auditions and not be tempted to agonize over minute aspects of your performance…  

To be continued...

Monday, April 28, 2008

"locking in" rhythmically


It's a common thing feel like you have good "downbeat time", yet listen to something you record and realize you're  rushing particular notes within a run or played certain rhythms inaccurately.  Here's one way to zero in on this:  Use a sequencer and make loops to practice drum rudiments, swing 8th notes and other rhythms at many tempos.  You want to use a sequencer and put a tempo increase in the conductor track of (say) two beats per minute every 10 bars.  In the first bar put in four quarter-note clicks to count you in, in the second bar start 8 bars of swing 8th notes (or any rudiment or rhythm you'd like to practice) with some flavor of drum sound  and in the tenth bar put 1 bar of rest.  Loop the ten bars.  The loop repeats with a little space between iterations while the tempo steadily increases.  You could practiced pure triplet swing and other swing ratios this way to get your 8th notes really grooving, montuno rhythms, drum rudiments between the fingers of one hand, backphrasing, polyrhythms... It's a good way to warm up and if you practice the drum rudiments it's a nice way to tune into the vocabulary drummers use.

When you play with a new rhythm section, listen to their time feel as a tune starts and whether the offbeats or the beats are accented by individuals or by the group overall.  You can really try to match the drummer or rhythm section for a while as a way of acclimating; get your notes to disappear into the ride cymbal.  

If you’re going to over-dub on a recording, same deal.  Spend a little time connecting with the subtle particulars of the feel. Check out the releases of the notes also -- eg. are the players making their quarter-notes long or short?.  If you get the track beforehand or get a metronome marking you can spend time playing simple rhythms and making them disappear into the (click or ride).  If you tap your fingers on your knee, away from your instrument, you'll make barely any sound -- this means you'll be able to hear the music you're referring to ultra-well.  Don't just focus on the drums - there’s always going to be individual differences in rhythmic conception and you often have to decide whether to "go with" one or the other players.  

Practice being AWARE of rhythmic differences while playing.  Just thinking occasional thoughts like, "the bass seems a little behind the drums when they enter", or, "this soloist is backphrasing", is a good start toward being able to maintain or shift your rhythmic approach when playing in a group...

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Personal differences in swing feel

Jazz musicians talk about the subtle aspects of how a rhythm section plays together and reacts to a soloist. At different tempos, people hear and phrase differently, sometimes influenced by the nature of their particular instruments.  At very slow tempos many players prefer to count or feel music in  subdivisions – so they feel slow 4/4 with swing 8th notes as 12/8, and feel slow 4/4 with even 8ths in 8th or 16th notes.  There seems to be different “break points” for this – some players are comfortable with slower tempos than others; some players don't have strong internal sense of time and need drums or someone delineating time pretty constantly in order for them to feel comfortable…     

At fast tempos, the tendency on most instruments is for the swing 8th notes to even out a bit..  Drummers, however, are bouncing the stick on the cymbal for a fast ride pattern.  Often the swing 8th note gets more pronounced the faster they go – closer to dotted 8ths and 16ths.  One of the difficulties with getting a good groove at bebop tempos is the individual differences between each musicians playing of 8th notes...

 Sometimes players can get a very relaxed feeling by delaying the “ands” at slow tempos - giving a feeling of laziness.  , Lester Young, Red Garland and Ray Charles all made use of this in their slow-tempo playing.   Backphrasing can combine well with this approach; but I’m talking specifically about where the “ands” are positioned in relation to the beats.  On the other hand, we’ve all heard music where delaying the “ands” in swing sounds jerky or corny, anything but relaxed.  There could be all kinds of reasons why music doesn't feel good rhythmically; the "jerky" feeling might come from players accenting too strongly, disrupting the continuity.  As Tolstoy said:  "Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.".

There are also some nice even-8th “pockets” that involve barely swinging at all – playing samba or funk with just a slight difference between the “ones” and the “ands” so there’s a bit of a lope to the music.  On the tune "Sounds Of Joy" Ed Blackwell just tore it up playing a feel like this.  Comments, anyone?

(thanks to drummer Jerry Kalaf for several of these ideas)

Thursday, April 24, 2008

a vocal and acting audition


I was contacted by the Central School of Speech and Drama in London, England. They hired me to accompany auditions for prospective graduate students. I was charmed by the language of their advert for the auditions: “Any relevant proof of ability in composing, writing or choreography should be bought with you to the audition…”.  Initially they booked me for five hours. With successive emails the time became less - they obviously had fewer applicants than expected. I was told later that this was their first year of West Coast auditions for the school. I don’t know how many non-musical applicants they had; ultimately there was one person for me to accompany. A drama teacher and a voice (for stage, not singing) teacher had made the trip out to audition him.

I had a quick rehearsal with him to try out his music. He sang a haunting Kurt Weill ballad, Lonely House. He also sang the fast two-beat Bock and Harnick tune She Loves Me. They were fine choices; showing his vocal and dramatic range well. He was a talented singer.  He also brought a piece from The Light In The Piazza to play on piano for the judges. His vocal pieces were both tricky sight reading and I was glad to run them both twice before his audition. He sounded very good. There were minor cueing problems that we worked out.  His music audition went very well.  The drama teacher stopped him right away, had him do some relaxation and posture exercises, then had him start the song again. She said to me, “we don’t have any of our music faculty here today; would you give him direction?”. I asked if she meant do you want to see if he can take direction as part of his audition? “Yes, exactly.” So I had him sing part of the ballad with a couple of different rhythmic feels. I had him crescendo on a phrase that went from high to low, that is, against the tendency of his range. On a section he sang with accents he seemed very used to I had him remove the accents and sing at a constant dynamic.  On his solo piano piece I had him change fingering to get a better legato and cleaned up his pedaling.  He was in good spirits for all of this and didn't seem a bit flustered.  I stuck around to watch his acting audition. (An actor's preparation can be mysterious to me, so I like to watch rehearsals and auditions)

He had memorized two monologues that I think the school must have chosen.  They were both directed at another person listening. This made it possible for the acting teacher to silently play the other person. First, she did physical adjustments with him right after he started, then she talked over the circumstances of the scene with him. "where is the character you are addressing? Give me some of the back-story - have you been talking a long time? Is this news to her or not? What was happening just before? Are we outdoors?" He was doing Arthur Miller from All My Sons where a man was telling a woman about her fiance’s death. Then there was a David Mamet monologue, I believe, a man talking to a woman about the conventions of polite conversation. “We have to be polite - we have to go through the routine of meaningless phrases, otherwise we are not agreeing to communicate.”  It was a little harder for him to make acting adjustments than singing ones but he seemed to be delivering whatever she asked of him.  I've seen people be quite inflexible in auditions and be flustered by requests.

Although the directions she gave were all pretty basic, the teacher seemed excellent; very observant and focused.  I enjoyed watching them work.

Saturday, January 5, 2008

Sorry, couldn't resist


"Dear Abby... I think my wife is cheating on me. I am a working musician and, as you would expect, travel a lot. I have been noticing strange things happening when I get home. Her mobile phone rings and she steps outside to answer it or she says, "I'll call you back later". When I ask her who called she gets evasive. Sometimes she goes out with friends but comes home late, getting dropped off around the corner and walking the rest of the way. I once picked up the extension while she was on the phone and she got very angry.
A buddy of mine plays guitar in a band. He told me that my wife and some guy have been to his gigs. He wanted to borrow my guitar amp. That's when I got the idea to find out for myself what was really happening. I said "sure, you can use my amp but I want to hide behind it and the gig and see if she comes into the venue and who she comes in with". He agreed. Saturday night came and I slipped behind my Marshall JCM800 half stack to get a good view. I could feel the heat coming off the back of the amp. It was at that moment, crouching down behind the amp, that I noticed that one of the tubes was not glowing as bright as the other three. Is this something I can fix myself or do I need to take it to a technician?
Thanks, Very Concerned."